Investment Strategies

Japanese Central Bank Vs Government – Who Wins Japan's Monetary Tussle?

Anton Tonev 20 June 2024

Japanese Central Bank Vs Government – Who Wins Japan's Monetary Tussle?

The exchange rate position of Japan's yen currency is becoming a serious challenge for policymakers in the Asian country. This article considers the pressures and differences between government and the central bank.     

The following commentary about a key macroeconomic issue concerning the Japanese fiscal and monetary policy debatecomes from Anton Tonev, head of strategy, Trium Larissa Global Macro, a family office-backed fund. The editors are pleased to add these insights, and welcome debate. Jump into the conversation! Email

The weakness of the Japanese yen (JPY) is becoming disorderly to the extent that it is starting to worry the Ministry of Finance (MOF), prompting it not only to ask the Bank of Japan (BOJ) to intervene directly in the currency market but also putting pressure on the central bank to expedite and increase the pace of interest rate hikes.  

The only problem is that a stronger JPY and higher interest rates would directly impede the BOJ’s efforts to break for good from Japan’s decade-long disinflationary vicious cycle; price stability is, after all, the BOJ’s primary mandate. 

For investors’ positioning in the Japanese markets, it is essential to understand how this “conflict” between the MOF and the BOJ eventually plays out. 

Yen is cheap by any measure 
The Yen looks cheap based on any fundamental metrics. For example, according to the Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER), as of 13 May 2024, the Japanese currency is at the cheapest level since at least 1989. 

In addition, [the dollar/JPY exchange rate] seems to have diverged from short-term portfolio flow metrics, such as interest rate differentials. For example, the divergence started already appearing at the beginning of April 2024 but became particularly pronounced after the BOJ intervention in early May. 

Finally, at the end of April, the dollar/yen rate reached overbought levels not seen since December 2001. These were some of the technical reasons why the MOF eventually instructed the BOJ to intervene and buy JPY in the open market.  

However, in our opinion, the MOF has other more structural reasons for wanting to see the Japanese currency stable, at the minimum. Facing exceptionally low returns on capital at home, thanks to the ultra-low rate policy the BOJ pursued to inflate the economy and meagre prospects for equity capital appreciation, Japanese private capital has chosen to invest abroad. 

This private capital exodus abroad seems to have been a clear trend in the last two decades. 

The shocking part is that the government and central bank intervention in the autumn of 2022 did not seem to have affected this capital flight trend at all.  

A cheaper currency can help a country improve its external imbalance or revive its economy, thus potentially pushing its inflation rate higher. A trend of constant currency depreciation can pretty much do the opposite – wreck a country’s economy by undermining trust in its institutional and governance frameworks. It is likely that Japanese government officials at the MOF may fear that the currency depreciation trend would hit such a point of no return unless something is done to promptly stem or potentially even reverse it.  

Kishida meets Ueda 
The BOJ, on the other hand, does not seem to have such concerns. For more than two decades, policymakers at the central bank have unsuccessfully tried to achieve their main mandate of price stability by getting the Japanese economy out of the spectre of disinflation.  

And then, in the early 2020s, we had the confluence of the Covid crisis and geopolitical tensions disrupting global supply chains and providing the structural base for a shift in the low inflationary period globally from which Japan also naturally started to benefit.  

Moreover, the Japanese currency started to weaken, fuelling the fire of Japanese inflation. This is "manna from heaven" for the BOJ – a Japanese central bank governor could realistically fulfil his primary mandate for the first time. BOJ governor Ueda is not going to let that slide, is he? 

In early May, there seemed to have been a “routine” meeting between prime minister Fumio Kishida and BOJ governor Kazuo Ueda. What was not routine, however, was that after the meeting, the governor’s tone concerning the currency’s effect on inflation suddenly changed. Only 11 days before, Ueda had said that “the yen’s recent fall did not have an immediate impact on trend inflation”; after the meeting with the PM, the governor said that the “BOJ may take monetary policy action if the yen falls affect prices significantly.”  

Currency impact  
The MOF ultimately controls the currency and only instructs the central bank to transact on its behalf. As such, policymakers have already shown their card. Anyone who knows or has dealt with Japanese officials knows that once they have embarked on a project, they will keep going at it until it is complete or they have run out of options, sometimes, even if only out of “pure pride.” 

The BOJ is reluctant to raise rates, as that goes against its mandate. However, a central bank is never fully independent from the government, and there is inevitably some pressure on the BOJ to be more hawkish. Therefore, if a hawkish BOJ does not stem JPY weakness, then the MOF/BOJ will embark on another round of intervention.  

Empirical literature shows that unilateral foreign exchange intervention seldom works, though, to be fair, most of the studies are done for emerging market countries with limited FX reserves. Japan not only has a sizeable official stock of dollars, but, in theory, it can also harness the private stock of dollars.  

Moreover, it can quickly get a swap line from the Fed, with the intervention effectively becoming dual, and the chance of success increasing substantially. So, Japan has options and still has an opportunity to stem the weakness of its currency. 

What about rates? 
The BOJ can sound hawkish, but we suspect it will stick to its initial assessment of postponing raising rates as long as possible so as not to jeopardise its inflation mandate.  

The worst possible outcome remains one of accelerated inflation, with or without JPY weakness, which becomes ingrained and pushes inflation expectations in the opposite vicious cycle to what Japan experienced before (so higher, not lower). With the stock of debt multiple times its GDP, to combat this rise in inflation, Japan will find itself trapped, unable to raise rates sufficiently quickly for fear of triggering a vicious debt cycle instead.  

Suppose the inflation cycle globally has turned on the back of shifting global supply chains, advanced manufacturing, AI, green energy capital investments, and geopolitical tensions. In that case, Japan will not be the only country facing the choice of a vicious inflation cycle on the one hand and crippling debt payments on the other.  

However, while in the preceding three decades it was emerging market countries that had to face that predicament, in the years to follow, it would be mostly developed countries because they are the ones that have substantially increased their debt stock. Japan may be the first one that the markets would force to act.

Register for WealthBriefingAsia today

Gain access to regular and exclusive research on the global wealth management sector along with the opportunity to attend industry events such as exclusive invites to Breakfast Briefings and Summits in the major wealth management centres and industry leading awards programmes