Legal
Hong Kong’s Regulators “Ineffective” In Lehman Minibonds Scandal

The split responsibility between Hong Kong’s regulators renders them “largely ineffective” and is to blame for the Lehman Minibonds scandal, said a report.
The split responsibility between Hong Kong’s regulators, namely
the
Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the Securities and Futures
Commission, renders them “largely ineffective” and is to
blame for the loss of millions of dollars of investors in Lehman
Brothers
structured notes, said a report.
The Legislative Council Report published yesterday, said
that the issues arose from the fact that
HKMA and the
SFC work as two separate
entities, preventing them from fully realising the problems at
stake.
The SFC regulates brokers and approves financial products,
while the HKMA regulates banks’ securities businesses. The report
recommended that Hong Kong be overseen by a
single regulator.
The report added that former HKMA chief executive Joseph
Yam
Chi-kwong should bear ultimate liability for the debacle, as it
occurred on
his watch.
In 2008 Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy – at the time an
estimated
HK$20.2 billion worth of Lehman Brothers structured products had
been sold
through banks to over 43,700 investors. Many of these investors
complained that
the bank staff had not appraised them of the nature and risks of
such products.
HKMA had received nearly 20,000 complaints
by December 2008. Although the regulators say much of the money
has been returned to investors now, there are still calls for an
overhaul of the Hong Kong's securities framework.
“The securities business of banks being regulated by both
HKMA and SFC is largely ineffective. The administration and
regulators...should
examine the feasibility of placing the securities business
conducted by banks
under the regulation of SFC,” said the council.
The defense
Meanwhile the SFC issued a note yesterday in response,
saying it will “study the reports, and will continue to work with
the
Government and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority in enhancing
investor
protection in Hong Kong.”
In defense of itself, the SFC said: “Shortly after
the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008, the SFC initiated
top-down
investigations into all distributors of Minibonds resulting in
agreements with
banks and brokers which have enabled the return of approximately
HK$8.88 billion
to more than 35,000 eligible customers, and a further HK$995
million in
compensation under the enhanced complaints handling procedure
which remains in
progress.”
“The use of the banks’ commission revenue from the
sale of Minibonds to fund the trustee action to secure the return
of collateral,
has provided additional returns to the vast majority of retail
investors, who
have received in total between 85 per cent and 96.5 per cent of
their initial
investment,” said the SFC.
The SFC said it also implemented a package of enhanced
investor protection measures in 2010 to strengthen the regulatory
regime
governing the offering of investment products, and will set up an
Investor
Education Centre in the fourth quarter of this year, to take up
broader
investor education responsibilities.
HKMA could not immediately be reached for comment.