Technology
Guest Article: Omgeo Says Why It Pays To Invest In Operations Such As Trade Automation

Even as regulation is dramatically changing the global post-trade environment, leading market participants in Asia are staying ahead by embracing and shaping operational best practice, argues Clare Fraser, managing director of strategy at Omgeo.
Even as regulation is
dramatically changing the global post-trade environment, leading
market
participants in Asia are staying ahead by embracing and shaping
operational
best practice, argues Clare Fraser, managing director of strategy
at Omgeo. The
firm – founded in 2001 – provides post-trade processing solutions
to automate operations
and reduce risk in areas such as equities, fixed income and
derivatives. This
area is part of the “plumbing” of the financial system: an area
which tends not
to get much attention until there is a problem. But it is crucial
for the
smooth functioning of the wealth management industry. The editors
at this
website welcome this contribution on a complex but vital
topic.
Competition,
cost pressures and regulatory change continue to drive decisions
among capital
markets participants worldwide. In today’s challenging market
environment, the
argument for investing in operational infrastructure to lower
risk or implement
industry best practice often goes unheard among more immediate
calls to cut
spending or meet increasing capital requirements. This is often
the case even
when investment translates into direct cost savings and increased
efficiency in
the longer term.
Investment
in certain industry best practices, such as automation of the
trade
confirmation process, leads to fewer failed trades, lower costs,
and reduced
risk. Yet without immediate incentive, regulatory or otherwise,
some firms
sometimes lack sufficient motivation to invest in these areas in
order to reap
these long-term benefits. Like going to the gym, we know we
should do it and
that it’s good for us, yet sometimes it is impossible to
self-motivate unless
incentivised in the short term.
However,
some clients are taking immediate steps now. Leading industry
players are
moving ahead with implementing industry best practice in
Asia,
not only to stay ahead of the regulatory curve, but to remain
more competitive
and shape industry best practice. This drive for process
improvement benefits
the market overall, with post-trade automation and
standardisation creating
market efficiencies that in turn result in higher returns for
investors.
Same-day affirmation
One
way to measure post-trade efficiency is to track same-day
affirmation rates.
SDA refers to the verification of trades on the same day they are
executed
(T+0) and is becoming widely recognised as an industry best
practice.
According
to a study commissioned by Omgeo, securities trades verified on
the day of
execution have a much higher chance of settling on time and are
less likely to
fail. In fact, settlement efficiency in countries with SDA rates
of over 90
percent – India, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore and Korea –
is 26 per cent
higher than in countries with SDA scores of less than 70 per cent
– Brazil,
Italy, South Africa and the United States. Many Asian markets
lead the way in
SDA, especially for equity trades.
On
the other hand, SDA rates for fixed income trades in Asia,
as well as other regions around the world, remain stubbornly low.
Many segments
of the Asian fixed income market continue to rely on manual
processes such as
spread sheets, faxes and emails.
However, the market realises the opportunity to streamline
operations in
this area, and there is continued dialogue and strong agreement
that industry
participants need to work better together to bring greater levels
of automation
to Asia fixed income in order to both establish and shape
operational best
practice for that market.
In
practice, some firms are further along that journey than others.
In markets
like Asia, automating the trade confirmation process through the
adoption of
existing vendor solutions enables firms not only to reduce risk
and costs
sooner and on their own terms, but also to focus their resources
on other areas
of business complexity that this market undoubtedly presents,
such as a myriad
of stringent know-your-client requirements that exists across
different
jurisdictions in the region. This gives some market participants
a competitive
advantage over firms that wait for regulation to shape
improvements to how they
manage their post trade operations.
While
regulation can be an efficient way to drive market-wide change
and would
generate a welcome improvement to the current global post-trade
environment, it
is leading firms like these that are not only investing in
industry best
practice ahead of the curve but indeed driving it and, in the
process, ensuring
the markets in which they operate are more efficient and
that their clients are better served.