Client Affairs
Family Limited Partnerships Seen as Next Big Thing in Wealth Planning
Family Limited Partnerships are already a large market in the US but are starting to generate a buzz in the UK as wealth planners look for alternatives to trusts after recent tax changes.
The
UK trust sector has been in ferment since the
UK government imposed new taxes and charges on these vehicles two
years ago. But in the ever-inventive wealth planning industry, a
new vehicle is getting a growing amount of attention -
the family limited partnership.
FLP structures allow assets to be given away whilst the settler - such as a parent - keeps control of the trust. A gift will be exempt from inheritance tax so long as the donor survives for seven years after the FLP is set up. The general partner running the FLP’s assets is usually a limited company established by the parents and the children and grandchildren carry the status of limited partners in the vehicle.
When they are paid a capital gain or income such as a dividend, FLPs pay taxes on these payments, making them transparent vehicles.
Such features will look, at first sight, appealing to individuals
and families contemplating the changed trust rules that came into
force after the-then
UK finance minister and now prime minister, Gordon Brown, brought
out his finance act of 2006. As a result, since March 2006,
contributions to a trust generally carry an upfront 20 per cent
inheritance tax charge (on value) and, further, 6 per
cent inheritance tax charges (on value) every 10 years.
FLPs carry no such tax charges - potentially a significant
benefit.
The international private client law firm Withers is a proponent of FLPs as an alternative to trusts, especially for those families with significant assets.
"Family partnerships are taking off in the UK as they are one of the few tax efficient inheritance planning opportunities available to domiciled (and deemed domiciled) clients and, thus, are a hot topic in the UK and offshore investment houses and among the Channel Islands and Isle of Man administrators," Jay Krause, a partner at Withers and recent author on FLPs, told WealthBriefing.
As evidence, Mr Krause said Withers has already worked on several
FLPs. In one recent case, assets totalling £30 million were put
into a vehicle. The total size of this sector, if it takes off as
Mr Krause expects, could expand significantly. A number of firms
are looking at the sector, such as RBC Wealth Management, part of
Royal Bank of
Canada, which has a significant trusts and wealth planning
business operating from centres such as The Channel Islands.
A number of advisors and firms are bringing family partnerships to the attention of their clients. Other firms involved include Barclays Wealth, Merrills, Schroders, UBS and other investment houses, and Withers, Macfarlanes, Fosters, Speechley Bircham and other UK law firms, Bedells (of Jersey) and SMP (of Isle of Man) and offshore service providers.
Typically, people setting up a family limited partnership will
use an offshore trust/fund administrator, such as one operating
in the Channel Islands or
Switzerland, because these centres have developed a large
industry for this sort of work, Mr Krause said.
Fees charged for setting up such FLPs are broadly comparable, and certainly not more expensive, than setting up trusts, Mr Krause said. For example, he says the typical legal fees on a FLP with £10 million of assets works out at about £15,000, or about 15 basis points. “The initial setup costs should be roughly comparable to a trust,” he said.
So far, the market for FLPs in the
UK is so young that getting broad data on costs, or likely asset
sizes, is impossible. For some guidance, there is the
US market to consider, as these vehicles have operated there for
about a quarter of a century. In recent years, however, FLPs have
come under the scrutiny of
US tax authorities concerned they could be used to dodge taxes on
gifts, said Mr Krause.
Worries that FLPs in the
UK might prompt a similar crackdown by
UK authorities are unfounded, however, Mr Krause said. The
UK market is different because FLPs in the US have been used as a
way to mitigate the impact of gift tax, which did not exist as a
specific tax in the
UK, he said.
A point to consider, he argues, is that FLPs cannot be used to claw tax back or defer it, which has been a concern for HMRC about other wealth planning vehicles in the past, he said. Liability partnership interests do not carry management rights, which means younger generations need not have access to underlying FLP assets.
Another benefit, as Withers explained in a recent briefing note
on FLPs, is that the investment advisors and administrators of
these vehicles must be regulated by the Financial Services
Authority, the
UK's financial regulator, or recognised offshore providers, which
will be reassuring to their users by ensuring a minimum standard
of compliance and regulatory oversight.
Elizabeth Middleton, an associate at private client law firm Boodle Hatfield, reckons FLPs add an option for wealth planners, although she said they lack some of the flexibility of trusts, such as the ability to vary interests in trusts depending on the financial knowledge and circumstances of the next generation.
“There is certainly a bit of a buzz about such partnerships, principally in the context of an alternative vehicle to trusts for holding the family business or assets,” she told WealthBriefing.
“The idea is that the second generation of a family business cannot just run off with assets or take responsibility before they are ready as only the general partner can manage the business. Limited partnerships are transparent for tax purposes so they give rights to income and capital distribution, as if the partners held the assets directly,” Ms Middleton said.
If partnership interests are given to minors by their parents, the parents will continue to pay tax on income paid out while the children are liable for capital gains, she said.
So far, Ms Middleton said she has not seen such a vehicle set up
specifically for inheritance tax-planning purposes in the
UK, although they may develop but she cautioned: “They are not a
panacea for the long term tax efficient transfer of assets
between generations.”
“It is one avenue to think about particularly where an inheritance tax charge could not be funded,” she added.
The
UK government may imagine it has clamped down on what it regards
as abuses of trust law, but with demand for the ability to plan
inter-generational wealth remaining strong, it is hardly
surprising that new vehicles are emerging to meet the need.